Hi {{ first_name | default: there }}

The median person who has ever been paid to clip a video has earned, in total, about twenty-four dollars. At the other end of the same market, one clipper made sixty thousand in a single month cutting up one streamer's footage. Both numbers come out of the same industry, and it's this week's subject.

It's called clipping. You take someone's long podcast or livestream, carve out the fifteen seconds worth watching, post it across TikTok, Reels and Shorts, and get paid by the view — a few dollars per thousand, whether you have fifty followers or fifty thousand. That loop is now a $40 billion industry heading for nearly $200 billion by 2033. Whop, the biggest marketplace, moved 3.5 billion clipped views in a single month and is valued at $1.6 billion. MrBeast runs his own. The clippers themselves are mostly anonymous, often with no attachment to anything they cut, increasingly leaning on AI tools that let one person ship fifty clips a day. A 45-minute video is a room almost nobody walks into. A clip is the best of it, lifted out and dropped where the people already are.

The part I keep snagging on is which way round it runs now. Clips used to be the leftover, the thing you made after the real work. Now the clip is the point, and the hour-long podcast is just the quarry it's cut from. The piece is about who built that, who's getting rich and who's making twenty-four dollars.

In today’s issue:

— Tom Mackay, Founder & Editor

The World Cup is on, and I've watched more football this month than in the past two years put together — most of it, I'll admit, on my feed rather than live. When I miss a match, thousands of streamers have already done the work: the goal, the miss, the row on the touchline, cut and posted before the final whistle. It never occurred to me that I was taking part in a market worth tens of billions of dollars.

That's what clipping has quietly become. Not a marketing format but an industry, one that grew from a niche creator habit into a short-form market projected to reach $193 billion by 2033, with brands now paying by the verified view instead of a flat fee to whoever has the followers. The stat that told everyone to make things shorter for a decade turned out to be fabricated — the problem was never length.

The catch is the part no budget can touch. You can pay for the face and fund the production, but you cannot pay for the moment that makes someone stop and send it on. A brand can't brief a clip. It can only make something worth clipping and trust the machine to find it.

👉 Read the full piece

I have a drawer that is mostly the corpses of hair ties — snapped elastics, the good one that is never there when I need it, the small domestic war every woman I know is quietly losing. Which is why it stings a little to report that a six-foot-five Norwegian has, apparently, won it.

This is supposed to be Erling Haaland's summer, and by every measure it is: two goals to send Brazil home, Norway in its first World Cup quarter-final, a whole country doing the Viking Row from Times Square to its own parliament. Yet a real share of the conversation is about his ponytail — or the $5 hair tie holding it, a Scandinavian-looking thing called KKNEKKI that he didn't launch and didn't invent, but simply bought a piece of because he was already wearing it. Ambassador and investor at once. Norwegian traffic to the site jumped more than three hundred percent and the collaboration sold out.

In a decade when celebrity has become a supply chain and every "real" moment arrives with a rollout, the last believable luxury is the small thing that was already true before anyone was watching. He didn't make a hair tie famous. He made not needing a story the whole story.

👉 Read the full piece

Tony Gardner's effects studio wired working electronics into two chrome helmets, and for the next two decades almost nobody saw the men underneath. That was the point. Daft Punk didn't hire a stylist and pick a colourway — they commissioned a piece of industrial engineering and disappeared behind it.

Which is the part most people get wrong about visual identity. We talk about it as styling, a logo or a palette laid over the top of someone, when the identities that end up defining a decade get built somewhere else: in the collision between people with no obvious reason to be in the same room. Björk handed the cover of Biophilia to the couturier who'd just printed the first 3D dress on a runway. Gaga ran Haus of Gaga like Warhol's Factory, a room full of disciplines rather than one designer's sketchpad. The helmet, the album cover, the shoes nobody could walk in — not one was the work of a single mind.

The disagreement is the useful part, not the friction to smooth out. One side brings the feeling, the other brings the physics, and the object only exists because both were in the room. You don't build something that outlasts its makers by staying inside your own head. You build it by handing the world to people who see it nothing like you do.

👉 Read the full breakdown

Two women from South Philadelphia, more than four decades in the same neighbourhood, and they had never once crossed paths until the day this ad was filmed. That detail tells you almost everything about what La Colombe and Uncommon made here, because the woman standing next to you on screen isn't an actress hired to look like a neighbour. She's the neighbour.

There are no characters in "Must Be the Coffee." The baristas actually pull the shots at La Colombe, the mechanic has spent decades under real motors, and the whole thing plays less like a commercial than a short documentary about Philadelphia and a country falling hard for its national football team. In a summer when AI can generate a polished spot in an afternoon, a handmade piece built entirely from real people is the thing that still stops you.

The dream it sold didn't even come true — the US went out to Belgium, 4-1, the night it ran. It stings, and somehow the ad is better for it. Must be the coffee.

👉 Watch the campaign