I deleted Instagram fourteen months ago and it's one of the best decisions I've made. What's interesting is that it made me feel bad in a way I couldn't metabolise — a specific kind of hollow. Not sad, not angry, just slightly diminished every single time I opened it, and eventually I decided that particular transaction wasn't working in my favour anymore.

Leaving required something I didn't fully appreciate at the time. It required having lived before social media existed and having a before to compare the feeling to. Enough self-awareness, accumulated over enough years, to recognize what was happening to my nervous system and name it. The confidence to absorb the social cost of not being on it. All of that, and I still found it hard. For months afterward, my thumb kept moving to where the app used to live on the screen, reaching for a feeling that was always one scroll away and never quite arrived.

A thirteen-year-old boy with his first smartphone has none of that. He has an algorithm, and the algorithm got there first.

What's the manosphere?

The manosphere is not a subculture anymore. It's in classrooms in Australia, Britain and America, in the phones of boys who have never heard the word but are already fluent in the language, and in the political mainstream of the most powerful country on earth, where men who traffic in its ideas have been photographed at inaugurations and welcomed into the White House. We keep discussing it as though it's still approaching, and the boys it has already reached are not waiting for us to catch up.

It enters through the reasonable door of self-improvement — fitness, financial freedom, how to carry yourself in a world that seems designed for someone else and routes the audience, gradually and deliberately, toward something called the red pill. Named from The Matrix, the idea is that you've been asleep inside a comfortable lie, and waking up means understanding that feminism stripped men of purpose and identity, that mainstream culture was always rigged against them, and that the men willing to say this are simply the only honest ones in the room. Andrew Tate sits at the top of this world — the man who took an ideology quietly growing in the corners of the internet and dragged it, by sheer force of provocation, into the mainstream. His name is known by parents who have never opened TikTok, discussed in schools, in parliaments, in courtrooms.

This ideology has been growing in the specific places mainstream culture abandoned — in the loneliness of young men, in the collapse of the structures that used to tell a boy who he was and what his life was for, in the moments when the algorithm knows more about what you need than anyone who loves you does.

Louis Theroux with Harrison Sullivan, aka HSTikkyTokky. Source: Netflix

What Louis Theroux found inside the manosphere

Louis Theroux has always had a rare gift. He doesn't shout, doesn't attack, but simply observes and asks quiet questions until people reveal who they actually are. In Inside the Manosphere, which arrived on Netflix this week, that approach exposes something deeply uncomfortable: not just the men he finds in Ibiza, Miami and New York, but the world that made them possible and the platforms that made them rich.

Harrison Sullivan, HSTikkyTokky to his 240,000 followers, lives in Spain because he crashed a McLaren in Surrey and decided sunshine beat jail. He sells boys investment products the FCA has flagged as illegal and profits from OnlyFans creators while telling his audience that women who do OnlyFans repulse him. Myron Gaines, who hosts Fresh and Fit, tells Theroux he can't be a misogynist because he loves women and understands them, then becomes visibly uncomfortable the moment Theroux asks his girlfriend a single gentle question about their relationship. He ends the conversation before she can finish her thought. Justin Waller, who has a partner, two children, a third on the way, and a philosophy he calls one-way monogamy, changes the subject when Theroux observes this seems considerably riskier for her than for him. The camera stays on her face for a moment after he does.

@netflixuk

a big old 🚨 trigger warning 🚨, courtesy of #LouisTheroux: Inside The Manosphere

For all the talk of leading men, the content is overwhelmingly about women — rating them, ranking them, resenting them — which is a peculiar preoccupation for men who claim to have transcended them entirely. The more they speak, the more obvious it becomes: the confidence is performative. Real strength doesn't need to shout this loudly or this constantly. The loudest voices in this world are so often its most fragile.

When Theroux asks Sullivan why he doesn't simply try being a good person, Sullivan pauses. If he'd just done good things, he says, he never would have blown up. He'd just be anonymously working somewhere. Not because Sullivan is insightful, but because he has stopped pretending. What lies underneath, once the gap between the mask and the face has finally closed, is simply a young man who found a market and entered it. The ideology is the acquisition strategy.

The loneliness is the raw material. And at the bottom of every red pill rabbit hole — once the boy has been sufficiently convinced that these men alone are telling the truth is a $99 online university per month, a dubious crypto project, a trading platform that will quietly lose his money, an OnlyFans subscription sold to him by the same man who just finished explaining why women who do OnlyFans are beneath contempt. These aren't thought leaders. They're salesmen who discovered that manufactured outrage converts better than advertising, and built a business model around it.

Louis Theroux with Sneako (Nicolas Kenn De Balinthazy) — a man who has been banned from most major platforms. Source: Netflix

The most isolated generation in history

The boys drawn into this are lonely in ways we've been remarkably good at ignoring. One in four American men under thirty-five reports feeling lonely most days — not occasionally, not during hard times, but as the ordinary texture of waking life. Eighty percent of Gen Z felt lonely in the past year. The most connected generation in human history, raised inside technology designed to bring people together, now ranks among the most isolated people alive. The attention economy was never really in the business of connection — it was in the business of almost-connection, the hollow that keeps you returning, the transaction that never quite satisfies and therefore never ends.

Into that hollow came men offering the one thing nothing else was: a story where the boy watching wasn't invisible, wasn't the problem to be corrected, but the protagonist who had finally woken up, whose anger wasn't random but righteous, whose life made a particular kind of sense. The red pill arrived first not because it was powerful but because it showed up, and mainstream culture, for all its stated concern about boys, was still in a meeting about it.

The algorithm found all of us

We handed our children these platforms without understanding what they were, reached for them ourselves every morning, and built entire industries around exploiting the attention they generated — advertising, marketing, media — without ever seriously asking what that attention was costing the person paying it. And the uncomfortable truth is that we're not outside this. The algorithm didn't only find lonely teenage boys. It found all of us, each in our own way, and learned what we needed before we did — the outrage that keeps us scrolling, the validation that brings us back, the feeling of almost-but-not-quite that ensures we never stop.

The manosphere is the extreme end of a spectrum we're all on. The difference is that we get to tell ourselves a more flattering story about why we keep checking our phones.

Australia has banned social media for under-sixteens, and several countries are following suit. But a ban isn't an education, and education alone may not be enough either because knowing something is bad for you has never reliably stopped anyone from wanting it. Addiction doesn't yield to awareness. The smoker knows. The alcoholic knows. And most of us, if we are honest, know exactly what our phones are doing to us and reach for them anyway, first thing in the morning, last thing at night, in the silences between other things. Teaching young men about algorithms is necessary and right and almost certainly insufficient, because the platforms are not designed to be understood — they are designed to be felt, and what they make you feel is real even when everything generating the feeling is not.

What the manosphere sells isn't hate, even though hate is what it eventually delivers. It sells significance—the sense of having woken up to something true that the sleeping world can't see, the hollow of the scroll replaced at last by something that feels like solid ground. Every platform sells a version of this, dressed differently, priced differently, but built on the same understanding of human loneliness and what it will tolerate. The manosphere simply follows that logic to its end, strips away the tasteful branding, and says plainly what the rest of the attention economy has always been saying more carefully: I found you. I see you. I will make you feel real.

I deleted Instagram because I finally recognised what it was selling me and decided, after enough years, that I didn't want it anymore. The boys in that documentary didn't get that choice. But then, did any of us really. The only question worth asking, when you put this down and pick up your phone, is what your algorithm has decided you need to see.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading