Hi {{ first_name | default: there }},

The Oscars are coming up this weekend. A good reminder that narratives move quickly. Timothée Chalamet had the Best Actor story locked — until he suggested nobody really cares about opera anymore and the entire arts community decided to prove him wrong.

It’s funny how quickly perception can shift. One sentence can change the story around a person, a campaign or even an entire industry.

You see the same thing happening in sport. For years the line was that no athlete is bigger than the game. Most of the time that’s true. But every now and then someone stretches the rule. Jordan did. Messi definitely does.

What’s changed over the past decade is how often that shift happens. Athletes, creators and founders aren’t only part of the system anymore. Increasingly, they are the platform. Once the audience follows the individual, the balance of power changes with it.

This week’s rundown looks at a few places where that shift shows up; from Messi’s deal structure to fake brand collaborations, an Oscar race that turned in a single interview moment, and a running campaign that barely shows the product.

In today’s issue:

— Tom Mackay, Founder & Editor

The maximum rookie salary in the WNBA is $76,535.

Flau'jae Johnson is 21, a senior at LSU, and technically still an amateur athlete. She's also a rapper signed to Jay-Z's Roc Nation, holds an equity stake in a professional sports league, has 25 active brand deals with Puma, Meta, Amazon, and Taco Bell, and carries a Forbes-estimated net worth of $7 million — built entirely while she was still in college. When she turns pro this spring, that $76,535 salary is what the league thinks she's worth.

She's been negotiating against that number for four years already. By the time any league or brand sits across from her professionally, they won't be negotiating with a rookie. They'll be negotiating with a media business that happens to also play basketball.

In 1985, David Falk put a royalty into Michael Jordan's Nike contract. Not a flat fee — a percentage of Air Jordan sales running indefinitely, tied directly to how the product actually performed. Nike's basketball division was struggling and Jordan was their best shot at turning it around, so they agreed. In year one, Nike sold $126 million worth of Air Jordans against projections of $3 million, and the royalty structure that looked modest across a conference room table in Beaverton became a river of money still running forty years later. Jordan earned $94 million across 15 NBA seasons. Nike now sends him more than that annually for a product line generating over a billion dollars a year — all because Falk locked in one principle before anyone could stop him: give whoever holds the audience a structural stake in what that audience generates, rather than a fixed number someone invented before anyone knew how things would go.

Falk didn't negotiate a bigger cheque. He negotiated a different kind of deal entirely — compound interest on yourself. The bet isn't on what you're worth today. It's on what you'll be worth when nobody can predict the ceiling.

From GOAT to GOAT, Lionel Messi ran the same play. He chose Inter Miami over Al-Hilal in July 2023, turning down a reported $400 million annual offer to take a deal that included equity in the club, a revenue share on new Apple MLS Season Pass subscriptions, and a percentage of Adidas' US sales growth. On debut day alone, MLS Season Pass logged 110,000 new sign-ups. Inter Miami's valuation moved from $600 million to over $1.4 billion. MLS revenue grew 27% year-over-year. Messi's value is architectural: subscription triggers, equity escalators, market penetration tied to a fanbase that follows him regardless of what league he's in. If Messi leaves, the economics leave with him. That's the structural dependency the Falk royalty was designed to create, just applied to everything instead of one shoe line.

For most of brand history, the infrastructure belonged to the brand. Television budgets. Retail shelf space. Global distribution. If an athlete wanted to reach a fan in Jakarta or Ohio, they needed a brand to carry them there. That meant brands decided who got amplified, and athletes negotiated within a system they didn't control and couldn't leave. The deal terms reflected that power structure because they accurately described it.

Instagram changed the description. Cristiano Ronaldo has 671 million followers who receive his message without a media buy, a brand brief, a rights fee, or anyone's permission. He decides what gets published. He decides who gets access. When Nike wants those 671 million people and they do, badly enough to have paid Ronaldo over $1 billion in career endorsements — they come to him with an offer worth his time to consider.

The direction of that conversation reversed sometime around 2012 and hasn't reversed back, regardless of what the contracts still say.

The brands that haven't absorbed this are still running sponsorship processes built for a world that no longer exists. They send decks. They talk about reach and impressions as though those belong to them. They ask for approval rights over content athletes post on channels they personally built, to audiences they personally cultivated, on platforms that aren't the brand's and never were. Across the table sit people who've already calculated the gap between what they're being offered and what their audience is actually worth — and who've been watching Flau'jae Johnson, Paige Bueckers, and Breanna Stewart while they waited for the offer to arrive.

👉 Read the full analysis

Those AI brand collabs dominating your feed — the Hermès x Carhartt workwear, the Miu Miu x Smeg refrigerators that had comment sections debating price points for things that were never manufactured, mainstream outlets running them as real product announcements — we looked at all of it and decided to make one properly. Brief first, tools second. No texture swaps. An actual customer, an actual creative direction, an actual reason for these two brands to exist in the same room.

We picked Nike x IKEA. The customer: apartment athletes. People renting studios in cities where the living room is also the gym, the home office, and occasionally the guest bedroom. The collection is called KINETIC — four products built around that constraint, a complete brand universe, lifestyle photography, the works. Industrial Zen. Flyknit upholstery, warm walnut, Air polymer bases. The tagline wrote itself.

We had a genuinely stupid amount of fun making this. And if anyone at Nike or IKEA happens to be reading — we're around.

👉 See our creative process

Timothée Chalamet had the Best Actor narrative locked by January. Golden Globe for Marty Supreme, the momentum building, the story writing itself. Then one sentence in a conversation with Matthew McConaughey — something about ballet and opera being art forms nobody cares about anymore — and the internet handed the rebuttal back to every dancer and opera singer with a phone. #WeCare. Conductors mid-performance. Singers filling concert halls. Academy members, as it turns out, who work in exactly the art forms he'd just consigned to irrelevance.

Oscar voting doesn't happen on a single night. It unfolds across several days, catching every headline, every reply thread, every standing ovation posted in response. Karla Sofía Gascón learned the same lesson last year — historic Best Actress nomination, old tweets resurfaced weeks before voting closed, the entire narrative gone in a weekend. Two different situations, same mechanism: the campaign is never separate from the work. It is the work. Every interview, every offhand comment, every sentence that travels further than you expected it to.

Just a few days out, the race looks different than it did in January. Whether that costs Chalamet the room he spent months getting into — we'll find out Sunday.

👉 Read the full analysis

A man in a tie sprints through a city clutching flowers, trying to catch a bus. Actual runners sweep past him. The camera follows them instead — one unbroken four-minute shot, solo runners, run crews, Sam Chelanga, and eventually the same guy charging up a staircase toward a train he's also going to miss. Five shoe models appear throughout. You'd only notice if you were looking.

"The Runners" arrives a year after Saucony's revenue fell 18%. The brand needed to figure out who else it was for beyond the Fleet Feet faithful. "Run as One" in 2025 started the answer — run club events, coffee shop residencies, Paris Fashion Week — and delivered 46% lift in branded search, net sales up 26.4% by Q4. This is the second chapter. It premiered at Metrograph, a New York arthouse cinema that normally programmes Godard retrospectives. Creative director Gus Johnston buried the product. The shoes are on people's feet, going about it.

Why it matters: Most athletic brands making something this emotionally ambitious keep the product visible enough to justify the budget. Johnston didn't. Cut it to thirty seconds and it becomes a different film entirely, the kind where someone crosses a finish line while a narrator explains what running means to them. The one-shot technique earns the runtime. The real question is whether a brand can actually build a positioning around "we make films worth watching" — and whether Saucony has the discipline to find out.

👉 Watch the campaign