
I don't follow Formula 1. I'll say it without much guilt: for years the engines struck me as exactly what they sound like, noise. But last weekend the championship came to my city, and there's something about the whole circus pitching its tents on the edge of Barcelona that makes you want to look, even if you can't tell a fast lap from a bad one. So I put the race on. Partly, if we're being honest, to see whether Kim Kardashian was in Lewis Hamilton's box, whether the sport and the gossip were going to share a screen.
The first thing I noticed wasn't Hamilton, or Kardashian. It was the clock. The familiar green, the classic Rolex green that has timed Formula 1 my whole adult life, was gone. In its place, another name: TAG Heuer. Since when? Why? And off I went to find the story behind a defeat so quiet almost nobody had mentioned it. What I found was much bigger than a change of watches.
An offer Rolex chose not to match
Rolex had been Formula 1's official timekeeper since 2013. More than a decade with its crown sitting in the corner of the frame, discreet, almost institutional, the way it sits at Wimbledon and the US Open: present, elegant, asking for nothing. In 2024 that ended. Formula 1 signed a ten-year global partnership with LVMH, the French conglomerate that owns Louis Vuitton, Dior, Moët & Chandon, Bulgari and, yes, TAG Heuer. The deal began on 1 January 2025 and runs through 2034. The press put it somewhere between a hundred and a hundred and fifty million dollars a year. Rolex had been paying about fifty. LVMH put down double, or more, and walked away not with an advertising slot but with the whole clock.
TAG Heuer is no newcomer to this. It was the first luxury brand to appear on a Formula 1 car, in 1969, the first to sponsor a team, in 1971, and it had timed the championship once before, from 1992 to 2003. The handover arrived just as the championship turns seventy-five. All of it at once, as if someone wanted the change of era to be impossible to miss.
@tagheuer Seoul in the spotlight. Ahead of a special event celebrating the iconic TAG Heuer Monaco collection, our Designed To Win campaign lit u... See more
But TAG Heuer isn't the story
LVMH didn't buy a stopwatch. It bought the entire weekend. Moët flooding the podium again. The winner's trophy arriving inside a Louis Vuitton trunk, hand-stitched by the Maison's artisans outside Paris, the monogram V doubling as a finish line. Belvedere installed as the first official vodka of Formula 1, because apparently that is now a title worth holding. The Maisons stepping in not as sponsors of a sport but as set-dressers of an experience, turning every Grand Prix into a runway that happens to have cars on it.
It's tempting to read this as one watch brand outbidding another, and the trade press has mostly read it that way. But that reading misses what actually changed, which has almost nothing to do with watches and almost everything to do with us.
Rolex sold an object. LVMH sells a world.
Rolex sold you a thing. You bought the watch, you wore the watch, and the meaning lived quietly on your wrist, legible to the three people in the room who knew what they were looking at. That was the old luxury. It worked precisely because it didn't show itself, because the best way to own something was the version nobody else could see.
LVMH doesn't sell you an object. It sells you a world to step inside. It doesn't want you to own the thing; it wants you at the party, filming the party, posting the party. Me, switching on the race to see whether Kim Kardashian turned up, am exactly who it's talking to. I will never buy a TAG Heuer in my life. But I'd already bought what they were really selling, which is the feeling of belonging to something glamorous and current and watched.
We talk about luxury as though brands do things to us. They seduce us, they manufacture our wanting. But the jump from the Rolex model to the LVMH model wasn't done to us. We led it. It traces, almost exactly, the way we decided to live over the last decade. Private meaning stopped being enough. The watch only three people understand is a relic of a culture that believed status could be quiet, that the best version of having something was the one nobody could see. We don't believe that anymore. We believe a thing barely counts until someone has seen it. Identity went from something you possess to something you perform, from the wrist to the feed, and the luxury houses, who read us better than we read ourselves, simply followed us there.
Netflix understood it first. Drive to Survive turned a niche European sport into a soap opera and multiplied its American audience, because people don't fall in love with lap times. They fall in love with characters. Liberty Media understood it when it bought the sport. And LVMH, watching a seventy-five-year-old institution reinvent itself as a content machine for a young, global, screen-born audience, recognised the most valuable real estate of the decade and bought ten years of it.
There's a small, almost embarrassing rhyme in the fact that I watched all this from Barcelona. The race in front of me had, this very season, lost its own name. For decades it was the Spanish Grand Prix. This year that title moved to a new street circuit in Madrid, and the Barcelona race, run on the same track since 1991, was quietly renamed the Barcelona-Catalunya Grand Prix. Same Sunday, same event, two old names gone. The clock stopped saying Rolex. The race stopped saying Spain. Both gave up the name that used to be the whole point, because the name was the old kind of value, inherited and assumed and quiet, and the new economy doesn't pay for quiet.
Rolex, for what it's worth, hasn't lost. It still has Wimbledon, still has the aristocratic hush of a sport where the crowd is asked to fall silent and the brand can go on doing what it has always done beautifully, which is almost nothing, very expensively. That isn't a retreat so much as a refusal. Rolex looked at what luxury was being asked to become — loud, social, perpetually online, a thing to inhabit rather than own — and said no.
Which leaves the only question that interests me, and it isn't which conglomerate won the Grand Prix. It's that the watch, the object whose entire job was to keep time privately, on your wrist, for you, now has to earn its place by being seen. The most discreet luxury object ever made has just been handed a new instruction: perform. The clocks didn't change because the brands changed. They changed because we did.

